<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1&#8230;2&#8230;3&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mccs1977.com/2006/08/03/123/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mccs1977.com/2006/08/03/123/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Machine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:34:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mccs1977</title>
		<link>http://mccs1977.com/2006/08/03/123/comment-page-1/#comment-8008</link>
		<dc:creator>Mccs1977</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccs1977.com/2006/08/03/123/#comment-8008</guid>
		<description>[...] Iowa caucus rules are &#8220;arcane.&#8221; I rather like them. They&#8217;re half a step closer to preferential voting than New Hampshire. Speaking of which, would you like to see the primaries stay the way they are in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Iowa caucus rules are &#8220;arcane.&#8221; I rather like them. They&#8217;re half a step closer to preferential voting than New Hampshire. Speaking of which, would you like to see the primaries stay the way they are in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

