“It’s good what you did in Iraq.”
“That’s a real good thing you did to Saddam.”
“Now wish it into the cornfield, Georgie…wish it into the cornfield!”
Welcome to the Machine
“It’s good what you did in Iraq.”
“That’s a real good thing you did to Saddam.”
“Now wish it into the cornfield, Georgie…wish it into the cornfield!”
12 Comments
Who else but the supreme screw-up could turn Saddam into a martyr. Nice work George.
I speaketh! Someone was saying that Saddam’s execution by the Americans, the ones pulling the strings, made Saddam closer to those who have already been killed in the insurgency. So, he is a martyr and a hero to them. Shish! We do know why Bush wouldn’t allow Saddam to be tried by the Hague – he didn’t want to set a precedent.
BTW, your site does not come up in the RSS feed. Hmmm. I’m going to try to reestablish it. In the meantime, have a good New Year Day Eve!
I’ll have to see what’s going on with the RSS…Thanks for the tip.
Speak. Good post. Are we the only ones counting?
d.
It’s funny, but Saddam was in no way responsible for any of the 3000 US soldiers deaths. And it’s taken that many before they dcided to come up with a strategy. Should have went in there with one, arseholes!
3000..Its just anumber..WW2 3000 killed inoneday at D-day…chill out..We are fightng a war in Iraq withterroristand at home..Because ofPrez Bush..noattacks…im sure you all wantusto be attacked?..right?Ed. Caveman, you should be ashamed, saying such things about the President…LOLÂ
The kangaroos have decidered, and Saddam has swung.
My guess is that he didn’t get tried by the Hague because that would have required that there be a FAIR trial. Sure, he’d probably be imprisoned for life or killed in the end anyhow, but it wouldn’t have had the same rubber-stamp guarantee that letting the Iraqi “government” prove what a FINE DEMOCRACY they have *cough… choke… cough*
oohhhh Ferd..you belive in Free speech..BUAHAHAHAHAHAH..
Ed. Please read the About page, Caveman…this is not a public forum.
A, Caveman did it. He had to analgize the occupation of Iraq and how it’s “not a big deal” cause “3000 would die in one day” in WW2
There’s no fucking comparison between Iraq and WW2 dickwad.
Second, 40,000+ have been wounded and the majority of those would have died in WW2.
Battlefield medicine has made leaps and bounds.
Third, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on Dec 7th 1941 and Germany was wreaking havoc in Europe.
Osama Bin Laden attacked us on 9/11 NOT Iraq.
To reinforce, Japan attacked us in 1941; the United States did not follow that action up by invading Canada.
Hey polelover,,Yep Japan attacked us and we went to war with Germany…ohhh noooo..Osama attacked and we went into Iraq..we can fight many fronts..Iraq violated some treaties ..so im sure you want Saddam back in power huh?…I sooo love you guys
Leave it to a caveman to not understand the difference between ww2 and the occupation of Iraq
First, Japan attacked us in ww2 and we struck back
Second, Germany had invaded several countries and was attacking England.
I don’t expect a caveman to understand the difference….Apparently caveman watches too many John Wayne movies to know the difference.
But despite all that…hey caveman, Geico called, they want to make another commercial…
First Islamic radicals killed 3000 people then we attacked Iraq which harbored many terrorist…that wants to see you pole lover and me convert to islam..geezz how much can we say about this