<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What it really means.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Machine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:34:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bates</title>
		<link>http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/comment-page-1/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>Sigh. &lt;i&gt;(Bows head.)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh. <i>(Bows head.)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peacechick Mary</title>
		<link>http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Peacechick Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>Sad photo and something we will face up to very soon.  The Iraq government doesn&#039;t want us there and I don&#039;t think there will be a lot of cooperation with the additional forces.  Bleak.  It looks bleak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad photo and something we will face up to very soon.  The Iraq government doesn&#8217;t want us there and I don&#8217;t think there will be a lot of cooperation with the additional forces.  Bleak.  It looks bleak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graeme</title>
		<link>http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/comment-page-1/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>nicely put</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nicely put</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sewmouse</title>
		<link>http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/comment-page-1/#comment-1269</link>
		<dc:creator>Sewmouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>How much open space is there available around Arlington National?  Will they have to use Emminent Domain to acquire more land in order to fit the 21,500 other soldiers that George Walker Bush plans to murder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much open space is there available around Arlington National?  Will they have to use Emminent Domain to acquire more land in order to fit the 21,500 other soldiers that George Walker Bush plans to murder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fade</title>
		<link>http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Fade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the only way Bush will bring them home. This is all about Bush destabilizing the middle east to allow his buddies to control the oil.
But its not working.

And on the Nam tip, What did &quot;losing&quot; Vietnam result in? Now they are a valid trade partner, not an enemy. SO, hey, it worked. Just think if we leave Iraq now, in 30 years they will be a valued trade partner as well and we will only have lost 4,000 troops (by the time we get out) instead of 58,000. I know, it doesn&#039;t LOOK like a badass victory to you John Wayne types. But its better than this endless fuckup than the PNAC hath wrought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the only way Bush will bring them home. This is all about Bush destabilizing the middle east to allow his buddies to control the oil.<br />
But its not working.</p>
<p>And on the Nam tip, What did &#8220;losing&#8221; Vietnam result in? Now they are a valid trade partner, not an enemy. SO, hey, it worked. Just think if we leave Iraq now, in 30 years they will be a valued trade partner as well and we will only have lost 4,000 troops (by the time we get out) instead of 58,000. I know, it doesn&#8217;t LOOK like a badass victory to you John Wayne types. But its better than this endless fuckup than the PNAC hath wrought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BacchusÂ©</title>
		<link>http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/comment-page-1/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>BacchusÂ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>Militarily speaking we didn&#039;t lose Vietnam, in fact we beat the hell out of them.  We dropped more bombs on Vietnam than we did in all of world war two.  Go look it up Robbie.  So, an extended bombing campaign theory is shit because it was already going on.  Democrats have had to clean up the messes hawkish cowards get the country into, who beat the drums of war with hearing protection on so as to not disturb their copy of Regan reading the bible on cd.  lol
Get us into a war that is actually planned, the Repub&#039;s have apparently forgotten that part fo war, and seem to want to skip right to the economic prosperity, well it just dun&#039;t work like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Militarily speaking we didn&#8217;t lose Vietnam, in fact we beat the hell out of them.  We dropped more bombs on Vietnam than we did in all of world war two.  Go look it up Robbie.  So, an extended bombing campaign theory is shit because it was already going on.  Democrats have had to clean up the messes hawkish cowards get the country into, who beat the drums of war with hearing protection on so as to not disturb their copy of Regan reading the bible on cd.  lol<br />
Get us into a war that is actually planned, the Repub&#8217;s have apparently forgotten that part fo war, and seem to want to skip right to the economic prosperity, well it just dun&#8217;t work like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caveman</title>
		<link>http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/comment-page-1/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>caveman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccs1977.com/2007/01/10/what-it-really-means/#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>and we lose like Vietnam..thanks ya all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and we lose like Vietnam..thanks ya all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

