Comments on: “They’re on to me” http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/ Welcome to the Machine Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:34:56 +0000 hourly 1 By: Fade http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1889 Fade Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:30:04 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/#comment-1889 Duh, RogueWarrior. (Not like I need to inform Anyone here, we pay attention to the details,but) Every President appoints new guys at the beginning of their first term. What is unprecedented is for a President in his second term to remove some of his previous appointees. For Bush to re-appoint 8 members wouldn't really be such a big deal, EXCEPT that we find that it's because they didn't attack Democrats hard enough or didn't "Play ball" with this administration. The bottom line- The 8 who were fired were all good people, they just weren't CORRUPT ENOUGH for Bushco. It's time to end the corruption. Arrest them all. Rove, Gonzales, Roberts, every Republican Senator, and every other limpdick Republican who has turned their backs everytime this President has pulled some unconstitutional stunt just to increase the Republican party's power. Put them in Gitmo and Let the Democrats remaining decide when and If they deserve legal counsel. As for me, I consider them all Enemy combatants. Duh, RogueWarrior. (Not like I need to inform Anyone here, we pay attention to the details,but)

Every President appoints new guys at the beginning of their first term. What is unprecedented is for a President in his second term to remove some of his previous appointees.
For Bush to re-appoint 8 members wouldn’t really be such a big deal, EXCEPT that we find that it’s because they didn’t attack Democrats hard enough or didn’t “Play ball” with this administration. The bottom line- The 8 who were fired were all good people, they just weren’t CORRUPT ENOUGH for Bushco. It’s time to end the corruption.
Arrest them all. Rove, Gonzales, Roberts, every Republican Senator, and every other limpdick Republican who has turned their backs everytime this President has pulled some unconstitutional stunt just to increase the Republican party’s power. Put them in Gitmo and Let the Democrats remaining decide when and If they deserve legal counsel. As for me, I consider them all Enemy combatants.

]]> By: Frederick http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1885 Frederick Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:34:49 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/#comment-1885 Guess your too stupid to click on the links? It's not about that, but why did I have a feeeling this situation was too complicated for you. Guess your too stupid to click on the links? It’s not about that, but why did I have a feeeling this situation was too complicated for you.

]]> By: Roguewarrior100 http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1877 Roguewarrior100 Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:37:09 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/#comment-1877 US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President. Your Lord and Savior Bill Clinton fired all 93 when he took over the <strike>Oral</strike> Oval Office. US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President. Your Lord and Savior Bill Clinton fired all 93 when he took over the Oral Oval Office.

]]> By: HillCountryGal http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1875 HillCountryGal Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:56:52 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/#comment-1875 "I am <b>NOT</b> an (snort) animal." “I am NOT an (snort) animal.”

]]> By: PeacechickMary http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1874 PeacechickMary Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:14:10 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/#comment-1874 "And now, I will yodel without moving my lips." “And now, I will yodel without moving my lips.”

]]> By: Kvatch http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1873 Kvatch Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:00:23 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/#comment-1873 "Movites?" What's that. How about "motives"? :-) “Movites?” What’s that. How about “motives”? :-)

]]> By: Kvatch http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1872 Kvatch Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:56:15 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2007/03/13/theyre-on-to-me/#comment-1872 "I do not act with partisan movites! What's that behind me? Uh...my daughter drew it." “I do not act with partisan movites! What’s that behind me? Uh…my daughter drew it.”

]]>