Comments on: The first and last time… http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/ Welcome to the Machine Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:34:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Frederick http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-11026 Frederick Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:35:58 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/#comment-11026 Those labels were an excuse for stores like Walmart to stop carrying recordings that didn't fit their political world view. McCain, Lieberman, and <a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2005/7/15/134722/643" rel="nofollow">Hillary Clinton</a> were all on the bandwagon. Those labels were an excuse for stores like Walmart to stop carrying recordings that didn’t fit their political world view. McCain, Lieberman, and Hillary Clinton were all on the bandwagon.

]]> By: navyswan http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-11020 navyswan Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:04:00 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/#comment-11020 From the article, "[Gore] wasn't out to censor the objectionable material. "I'm a strong believer in the First Amendment," she says. Instead, Gore continues to advocate "consumer information in the marketplace." I have no problems with labels on things. That is a far cry from censoring or fining. From the article, “[Gore] wasn’t out to censor the objectionable material. “I’m a strong believer in the First Amendment,” she says. Instead, Gore continues to advocate “consumer information in the marketplace.”

I have no problems with labels on things. That is a far cry from censoring or fining.

]]> By: Frederick http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-11000 Frederick Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:10:51 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/#comment-11000 This time. But it wasn't so long ago that "<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4279560" rel="nofollow">liberals</a>" were the ones pushing for them. This time. But it wasn’t so long ago that “liberals” were the ones pushing for them.

]]> By: navyswan http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-10998 navyswan Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:17:55 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/#comment-10998 I still don't give Fox credit for anything but being hypocrites. They fight this while their news network pretends to be the morality police. It is the Fox news viewer types that push for such FCC morality laws. I still don’t give Fox credit for anything but being hypocrites. They fight this while their news network pretends to be the morality police. It is the Fox news viewer types that push for such FCC morality laws.

]]> By: Montag http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-10978 Montag Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:50:15 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/#comment-10978 "digitally obscured nudity" is indecent? what next? bleeped-out swears? i swear we're <i>this close</i> to enforcing thought crimes. “digitally obscured nudity” is indecent?

what next? bleeped-out swears?

i swear we’re this close to enforcing thought crimes.

]]> By: Lew Scannon http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-10974 Lew Scannon Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:20:56 +0000 http://mccs1977.com/2008/03/25/the-first-and-last-time/#comment-10974 How one thing on Fox can be construed as more indecent than anything else on the same network is ridiculous. How one thing on Fox can be construed as more indecent than anything else on the same network is ridiculous.

]]>