EmptyWheel of Firedoglake finds the man who has identified the key flaw in Reid and Obama’s rejection of Burris:
Many people have argued that the Constitution, specifically Article I Section 5, gives Reid, Obama and the Senate Dems the leeway they need to exclude Burris. Not so fast says Fein:
In Powell v. McCormack (1969), the United States Supreme Court held that under Article 1, section 5, “in judging the qualifications of its members, Congress is limited to the standing qualifications [age, citizenship and residency] prescribed in the Constitution.” The court made no distinction between representatives and senators, or between elected or appointed members of Congress. Speaking for the court, Chief Justice Earl Warren (whom President-elect Barack Obama admires) amplified that James Madison, father of the Constitution, and Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers, were emphatic that Congress could not erect qualifications beyond the constitutional floor. Madison argued at the Constitutional Convention that it would be “an improper and dangerous power in the Legislature. The qualifications of electors and elected were fundamental articles in a Republican Gov’t and ought to be fixed by the Constitution. If the Legislature could regulate those of either, it can by degrees subvert the Constitution.” Hamilton echoed: “The qualifications of the persons who may choose or be chosen … are defined and fixed in the Constitution, and are unalterable by the legislature.”
As Jim Henley notes, “Only conspiracy theories can explain why Harry Reid, the most inept parliamentarian there ever has been or ever could be, has a job.”
You can kiss the baby!
EmptyWheel of Firedoglake finds the man who has identified the key flaw in Reid and Obama’s rejection of Burris:
As Jim Henley notes, “Only conspiracy theories can explain why Harry Reid, the most inept parliamentarian there ever has been or ever could be, has a job.”